For The Love Of Balance
Posted by torbjornrive on August 14, 2008
Being environmentally-friendly is often about the larger-picture balance, and reconsidering the things you take for granted. Maybe you see your ability to get around by car as a given freedom, even a fundamental right. Propose to yourself that perhaps you’re wrong – and that years of habitual culture and advertising have told you that. Perhaps environmentalism, for you, is about sacrifice.
How about trading in your car for a motorbike?
In my and their defence, when someone comes across as anti-car, chances are they’re simply anti-overkill.
This is overkill:
This is not:
While I woulnd’t call motorcycles the “environmentalists choice”, it sure is a viable and efficient motorized way of getting around.
Generally, a ‘fuel-efficient’ car comes in at about 45 mpg at best (excluding hybrids). Motorcycles like this Yamaha average about 78 mpg. That means that if you’re riding it consciously you could probably do better. Like not accelerating up hills, for instance. A simple four-stroke (one cylinder) engine is all one needs to get around (for fair distances).
Some reasons you might not want to get a moto-bike is 1) safety, if that’s your concern, 2) bad weather discomfort, if that’s your concern, 4) inability to lug things around, and/or, 4) your girlfriend won’t let you (and wants to see you in a Hummer) – see above picture.
To conclude, motorcycles are neat (see also: “cool”), and don’t drag around extra weight. In my opinion that is the overkill factor; one person occupying a hollow metal machine, dragging ass around the city. Driving half a mile to the store for milk and beer isn’t overkill, but 30 million people doing the same thing is.







Michael Henreckson said
In my opinion all it takes is a little common sense and moderation. Hummers might be convenient if you live on top of a mountain in the wilderness. But I think there are a lot more of them in the suburbs, where they aren’t nearly as useful. Most people need a little more than a motorcycle, but they also don’t need an SUV.
torbjornrive said
Common sense and moderation IS a giant factor, you’re absolutely right. That would have made my post too short though, heh – it needed more beef.
Also, I just thought I’d shoot out that moto idea, as it’s been running around my head lately.
Tim Weaver said
Those animals are so fucking funny they make me want to merge lanes without looking.
YEAHA! RUMSFELD!
torbjornrive said
… just had to look into that, re Family Guy, gotcha.
Reid said
So I just found this article. Adds a new dimension to the argument.
http://ecomodder.com/blog/2008/09/01/motorcycles-scooters-great-environment-wrong/
torbjornrive said
ah, thanks for the link Reid. I’ve heard that about 2 and 4 stroke engines – it’s true, they’re still not the environmentalists choice.
It’s like those tuk-tuk’s in India, Thailand etc – F’n smelly, polluting things.
Reid said
I forgot to mention, both of those pictures are hilarious individually, but together they are hilarious^2.
Paul said
I think women look sexy when they drive Hummers.
torbjornrive said
really? I think they look really stoopid. The women I see driving Hummers are wearing hats sideways, or even bandannas. They just seem so self-absorbed.